I'm a bit behind after investigating the TCP performance issues that
turned out to be HW specific problems. It's a bit of a
dissapointment, I thought maybe there was a cool bug to fix in TCP :-)
Anyways, that means there are patches backlogged in my inbox and it is
also about time to do the hope
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:07:00PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:27:52PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:23:28PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:49:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 17 Sep 200
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:50:52PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 10:17 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > > 2) ATMEL USB driver
> >
> > These are both really new. I think I'll transfer them to my
> > wireless-2.6 tree, but still hold them back at least until 2.6.25.
>
>
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 10:17 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > 2) ATMEL USB driver
>
> These are both really new. I think I'll transfer them to my
> wireless-2.6 tree, but still hold them back at least until 2.6.25.
Also, atmel isn't even ported to mac80211 yet, is it?
> > 3) NL80211
>
> I ne
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 03:19:28PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> So it looks like what's left is:
>
> 1) ATH5K driver
> 2) ATMEL USB driver
These are both really new. I think I'll transfer them to my
wireless-2.6 tree, but still hold them back at least until 2.6.25.
> 3) NL80211
I need to chec
From: "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:07:00 -0400
> And the latest incarnation:
>
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/git-wireless-2007-09-19-16-57-43-0500.patch
>
> And is even smaller...down an additional 30%, or almost 1/6th of th
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:27:52PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:23:28PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:49:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400
> > > "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:23:28PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:49:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400
> > "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > P.S. Andrew, I'll send you a link to a new git-wireless.patch --
>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 06:51:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700
>
> > The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree.
>
> Ok I added in the Tehuti driver to net-2.6.24 and made sure the
> napi_stru
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:49:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400
> "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > P.S. Andrew, I'll send you a link to a new git-wireless.patch --
> > I'm sure you don't want a complicated git invocation... Until then,
> > I
On 9/17/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700
>
> > The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree.
>
> Ok I added in the Tehuti driver to net-2.6.24 and made sure the
> napi_struct conversio
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700
> The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree.
Ok I added in the Tehuti driver to net-2.6.24 and made sure the
napi_struct conversion was good too.
That only leaves the wireless bits :-)
-
To uns
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700
> The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree.
>
> Andy sent me a fix-it-for-net-2.6.24 patch which I'll send. It applies
> on top of the git tree.
>
> ipg-add-ip1000a-driver-to-kernel-tree.patc
MAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: net-2.6.24 plans
> [...]
> >
> >Andrew, I removed the troublesome IOAT patch. The only conflicts
> >and fixes you should need at this point are:
> >
> [...]
>
> Which IOAT patch
MAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: net-2.6.24 plans
> [...]
> >
> >Andrew, I removed the troublesome IOAT patch. The only conflicts
> >and fixes you should need at this point are:
> >
> [...]
>
> Which IOAT patch a
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
>Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:18 PM
>To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: net-2.6.24 plans
[...]
>
>Andrew, I removed
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:40:37 -0700
>
> > These two:
> >
> > git://porch.greyhouse.net/gospo/tehuti-2.6.git
> > ipg-add-ip1000a-driver-to-kernel-tree.patch
> >
> > plus
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400
"John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. Andrew, I'll send you a link to a new git-wireless.patch --
> I'm sure you don't want a complicated git invocation... Until then,
> I don't think you should try pulling wireless-dev...
OK, thanks.
The stuff
From: "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400
> I just (minutes ago) finished the mop-up of the patch mess which
> had accumulated on me during my KS-related travel and the subsequent
> period of catching-up. (I'm sure I still missed something or botched
> som
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:40:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I guess a lot of this could be avoided if I simply merge in whatever
> > external stuff you're sucking in.
> plus boatloads of stuff in wireless.
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:40:37 -0700
> These two:
>
> git://porch.greyhouse.net/gospo/tehuti-2.6.git
> ipg-add-ip1000a-driver-to-kernel-tree.patch
>
> plus boatloads of stuff in wireless.
Andrew, can you send these two to me under seperate cover? I'll
i
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Tomorrow (Monday) I want to rebase the net-2.6.24 tree one more time
> > to deal with all of the conflicts which exist betw
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
> Tomorrow (Monday) I want to rebase the net-2.6.24 tree one more time
> to deal with all of the conflicts which exist between
> linux-2.6/net-2.6 and net-2.6.24, but I'll likely defer that
> until the net-2.6 fixes
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:10:40 -0400
> David Miller wrote:
> > We've touched so much in net-2.6.24 that we really should be auditing
> > the thing and fixing any bugs that have been added. If you're bored
> > and looking for something to do, pick an odd NAPI
David Miller wrote:
We've touched so much in net-2.6.24 that we really should be auditing
the thing and fixing any bugs that have been added. If you're bored
and looking for something to do, pick an odd NAPI driver and audit it
in the net-2.6.24 tree.
You could try that weird "post patches on
Most if not all of my 2 week backlog of patches is in the net-2.6.24
and net-2.6 tree now. And any relevant -stable fixes will be
submitted in the next day or two.
Tomorrow (Monday) I want to rebase the net-2.6.24 tree one more time
to deal with all of the conflicts which exist between
linux-2.6
26 matches
Mail list logo
