"Dale Farnsworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> +if (has_tiny_unaligned_frags(skb)) {
>> +if ((skb_linearize(skb, GFP_ATOMIC) != 0)
>> +|| has_tiny_unaligned_frags(skb)) {
>
> There is no way that skb_linearize can return without removing all frags
>
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:43:08AM +, Paul Janzen wrote:
> Paul Janzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In mv643xx_eth_start_xmit:
> > [...]
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&mp->lock, flags);
> > [...]
> > /* Since hardware can't handle unaligned fragments smaller
> > * than 9
Paul Janzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In mv643xx_eth_start_xmit:
> [...]
> spin_lock_irqsave(&mp->lock, flags);
> [...]
> /* Since hardware can't handle unaligned fragments smaller
>* than 9 bytes, if we find any, we linearize the skb
>* and
Hi,
I am seeing backtraces on 2.6.15-rc7 on NFS traffic that are similar
to this one:
Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Call trace:
[c0005340] check_bug_trap+0xb0/0xd0
[c0005bb4] program_check_exception+0x174/0x4f0
[c0004f04] ret_from_except_full+0x0/0x4c
[c0021b8c] local_bh
