On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:06:00 +
Ani Sinha wrote:
> Hi Stephen :
>
> I was looking around but could not find clear evidence that a later
> version of iproute2 is compatible with an older kernel. Specifically,
> we are wondering if iproute2 v 3.6 is compatible with linux kernel
> 3.4. Highly app
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 13:06 -0700, Ani Sinha wrote:
>> Hi Stephen :
>>
>> I was looking around but could not find clear evidence that a later
>> version of iproute2 is compatible with an older kernel. Specifically,
>> we are wondering if iprout
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 13:06 -0700, Ani Sinha wrote:
> Hi Stephen :
>
> I was looking around but could not find clear evidence that a later
> version of iproute2 is compatible with an older kernel. Specifically,
> we are wondering if iproute2 v 3.6 is compatible with linux kernel
> 3.4. Highly appr
Hi Stephen :
I was looking around but could not find clear evidence that a later
version of iproute2 is compatible with an older kernel. Specifically,
we are wondering if iproute2 v 3.6 is compatible with linux kernel
3.4. Highly appreciate any pointers on this.
thanks
ani
--
To unsubscribe from
Hi Jamal,
jamal wrote:
> Pablo, below looks an oversight.
> I think there are some libraries like the mark target need also to be
> backward compatible.
Shouldn't "mark" be in capital letters?
>> lilsol:~# export IPTABLES_LIB_DIR=/root/iptables-1.4.0/extensions/
>> lilsol:~# tc actions add actio
I just submitted a tested, slightly reduced patch (example we dont need
to register matches) and it works as expected now. Thanks for the
excellent work Denys.
Pablo, below looks an oversight.
I think there are some libraries like the mark target need also to be
backward compatible.
cheers,
jama
On Mon, 2007-24-12 at 18:07 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Hi, probably like this will be better?
> Previous patch was not backward compatible.
>
> Btw i checked twice, name is changed from libipt_MARK to libxt_MARK. So
> probably when you have tested this, your iproute2 was looking to old
>
Hi, probably like this will be better?
Previous patch was not backward compatible.
Btw i checked twice, name is changed from libipt_MARK to libxt_MARK. So
probably when you have tested this, your iproute2 was looking to old
libipt_MARK (iptables is not deleting old libraries on make install).
---
