On 3/30/21 7:05 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Looks like a bug. 'flush' does not really make sense with 'id', but
> 'list id' works, so I think 'flush id' should also work.
right, neither were intended. If you know the id, you don't need the
generic list / flush option.
>
> Can you send a patch?
Ag
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:44:30PM +0800, xuchunmei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use iproute-5.10 with kernel-5.10.6, I found that ip-nexthop does not
> support flush by id, is it by design?
>
> Reproduce steps:
> # ip netns add me
> # ip -netns me addr add 127.0.0.1/8 dev lo
>
Hi,
I use iproute-5.10 with kernel-5.10.6, I found that ip-nexthop does not support
flush by id, is it by design?
Reproduce steps:
# ip netns add me
# ip -netns me addr add 127.0.0.1/8 dev lo
# ip -netns me link set lo up
# ip -netns me nexthop add id 105 blackhole proto 99
# ip -netns me
