From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:20:39 +1100
> David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .
> > But, thinking about this some more, it might actually be best to just
> > add them anyways to "TcpExt: " and get netstat's limitation fixed.
> >
> > Any other opinions?
David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
> But, thinking about this some more, it might actually be best to just
> add them anyways to "TcpExt: " and get netstat's limitation fixed.
>
> Any other opinions?
Use netlink?
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI
From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:29:14 -0500
> This is a patch which adds instruments to the TCP MTU probing. It
> breaks netstat -s because it extends the line length of
> /proc/net/netstat past 1024 characters, so it is not safe to apply.
> I'm sending it for refe
This is a patch which adds instruments to the TCP MTU probing. It breaks
netstat -s because it extends the line length of /proc/net/netstat past 1024
characters, so it is not safe to apply. I'm sending it for reference only at
this point.
-John
diff --git a/include/linux/snmp.h b/include/l
