Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 12:12:38 +0300 you wrote:
> There are several error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports(). I
> went through the code, and carefully audited it and made fixes and
> cleanups.
&g
There are several error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports(). I
went through the code, and carefully audited it and made fixes and
cleanups.
1) The ocelot_probe_port() function didn't have a mirror release function
so it was hard to follow. I created the ocelot_release
There are several error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports(). I
went through the code, and carefully audited it and made fixes and
cleanups.
1) The ocelot_probe_port() function didn't have a mirror release function
so it was hard to follow. I created the ocelot_release
There are several error handling bugs in mscc_ocelot_init_ports(). I
went through the code, and carefully audited it and made fixes and
cleanups.
1) The ocelot_probe_port() function didn't have a mirror release function
so it was hard to follow. I created the ocelot_release
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:27:53AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > If you resend, can you please squash this diff on top of your patch?
>
> Yep. I will resend. Thanks for basically writing v2 for me. Your
> review comments were very clear but code is always 100% clear so that's
> really great.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:18:07PM +, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:42:03AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> > index 9553eb3e441c..875ab8532d8c 100644
> > --- a/
Oops. Please ignore this patch. Part of it is missing.
regards,
dan carpenter
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:42:03AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> index 9553eb3e441c..875ab8532d8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 23:20:22 +0100
> From: Johannes Berg
>
> Fix two places where the structure isn't initialized to zero,
> and thus can't be filled properly by the driver.
>
> Fixes: 4a4b8169501b ("cfg80211: Accept multiple RSSI thresholds for CQM")
> Fixes: 9930380f0b
From: Johannes Berg
Fix two places where the structure isn't initialized to zero,
and thus can't be filled properly by the driver.
Fixes: 4a4b8169501b ("cfg80211: Accept multiple RSSI thresholds for CQM")
Fixes: 9930380f0bd8 ("cfg80211: implement IWRATE")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg
---
Dave,
Some of you wireless guys should really be ashamed of yourselves how
you handled the zd1211rw bugs reported by the sparc64 user.
Instead of helping the user work towards getting a working setup,
analyzing their bug and presenting test patches for the user to try,
all of you passed the buck around
11 matches
Mail list logo
