On 12/9/15 6:44 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
On 12/03/15 at 02:35pm, David Miller wrote:
From: David Ahern
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:35:58 -0800
RFC 3927 states that packets from/to IPv4 link-local addresses
(169.254/16) should not be forwarded, yet the Linux networking stack
happily forwards them.
On 12/09/15 at 02:44pm, Thomas Graf wrote:
> This feature is being used by a popular PaaS which leverages the
> 127/8 address space locally without polluting an entire routeable
> address space.
Kubernetes also wants to rely on this eventually, so please let's
not break it ;-)
--
To unsubscribe fr
On 12/03/15 at 02:35pm, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:35:58 -0800
>
> > RFC 3927 states that packets from/to IPv4 link-local addresses
> > (169.254/16) should not be forwarded, yet the Linux networking stack
> > happily forwards them. Before sending in a patch
From: David Ahern
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:35:58 -0800
> RFC 3927 states that packets from/to IPv4 link-local addresses
> (169.254/16) should not be forwarded, yet the Linux networking stack
> happily forwards them. Before sending in a patch I wanted to inquire
> if this behavior is intentional.
RFC 3927 states that packets from/to IPv4 link-local addresses
(169.254/16) should not be forwarded, yet the Linux networking stack
happily forwards them. Before sending in a patch I wanted to inquire if
this behavior is intentional.
Thanks,
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin
