On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:25:14AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, that does make sense.
> > Maybe the problem exists elsewhere, as thinking more about it,
> > it's only certain sites that seem to have the problem
> > (I not
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> Hmm, that does make sense.
> Maybe the problem exists elsewhere, as thinking more about it,
> it's only certain sites that seem to have the problem
> (I notice it mostly on bugzilla.redhat.com, but that's probably
> due to the amount
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:07:20AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anything changed recently in how e1000 handles checksum
> > offload ? My desktop box has been rock solid for months,
> > but the last few weeks I've noticed a lot of timeouts
> > over ht
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anything changed recently in how e1000 handles checksum
> offload ? My desktop box has been rock solid for months,
> but the last few weeks I've noticed a lot of timeouts
> over http etc.
>
> Further investigation with ethereal showed incorrect tcp check
Has anything changed recently in how e1000 handles checksum
offload ? My desktop box has been rock solid for months,
but the last few weeks I've noticed a lot of timeouts
over http etc.
Further investigation with ethereal showed incorrect tcp checksums
on certain packets.
Disabling rx/tx offload
