Re: dynamically set number of queues for 82598 devices in -stable

Hi Jeff, Any chance to get an opinion on that? Thanks, On Nov27 11:05, William Dauchy wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > I faced the problem described in commit 7e3f5c8: > ixgbe: fix bounds checking in ixgbe_setup_tc for 82598 > > This patch resolves an issue where users were not able to dynamically > s

dynamically set number of queues for 82598 devices in -stable

Hello Jeff, I faced the problem described in commit 7e3f5c8: ixgbe: fix bounds checking in ixgbe_setup_tc for 82598 This patch resolves an issue where users were not able to dynamically set number of queues for 82598 via ethtool -L I backported it for my v4.1.x build but I was wondering if this

Re: dynamically set number of queues for 82598 devices

From: William Dauchy Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:56:03 +0100 > Hello David, > > On Oct29 16:26, William Dauchy wrote: >> I faced the problem described in commit 7e3f5c8: >> ixgbe: fix bounds checking in ixgbe_setup_tc for 82598 >> >> This patch resolves an issue where users were not able to dynami

Re: dynamically set number of queues for 82598 devices

Hello David, On Oct29 16:26, William Dauchy wrote: > I faced the problem described in commit 7e3f5c8: > ixgbe: fix bounds checking in ixgbe_setup_tc for 82598 > > This patch resolves an issue where users were not able to dynamically > set number of queues for 82598 via ethtool -L > > I backporte

dynamically set number of queues for 82598 devices

Hello David, I faced the problem described in commit 7e3f5c8: ixgbe: fix bounds checking in ixgbe_setup_tc for 82598 This patch resolves an issue where users were not able to dynamically set number of queues for 82598 via ethtool -L I backported it for my v4.1.x build but I was wondering if thi