Mohamed Abbas wrote:
David Miller wrote:
I think this is a non-started until the SMP problems are worked
out. Is it still SMP challenged?
I been using d80211 stack for about a month I have not encounter any SMP
issues. We are currently involving validation engineers to do more
stress tests
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:40:27AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> >To heavily reduce maintainance burden I would like to see d80211
> >going mainline as soon as possible
> Does it have active maintainers?
>
> The DeviceScape people seem to have disappeared for months, except
David Miller wrote:
From: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:03:41 +0200
I am wondering about d80211 mainline merge plans.
I think this is a non-started until the SMP problems are worked
out. Is it still SMP challenged?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 01:40 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > To heavily reduce maintainance burden I would like to see d80211
> > going mainline as soon as possible, so that we can feature-freeze
> > the softmac port of bcm43xx and reduce maintainance to next to zero
> > there.
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:03:41AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering about d80211 mainline merge plans.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115477844206917&w=2
has the highlevel merge requirement. Only mentioned there as a side-note
we'll of course need a full code
> I am wondering about d80211 mainline merge plans.
I think this is a non-started until the SMP problems are worked
out. Is it still SMP challenged?
Not sure what the SMP problems actually were,
but in the test results of rt2x00 I haven't come across
a SMP related problem yet. It could be that
From: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:03:41 +0200
> I am wondering about d80211 mainline merge plans.
I think this is a non-started until the SMP problems are worked
out. Is it still SMP challenged?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" i
Michael Buesch wrote:
To heavily reduce maintainance burden I would like to see d80211
going mainline as soon as possible, so that we can feature-freeze
the softmac port of bcm43xx and reduce maintainance to next to zero
there. So if people want freaky features, we simply point them
to the d80211
Hi,
I am wondering about d80211 mainline merge plans.
Short:
I would like to see a mainline merge of d80211 happening
as soon as possible (next feature merge window).
Long:
I, as one of the main maintainers of the bcm43xx driver, am
maintaining two different branches of the driver at the moment.
