Re: concurrent rhashtable test failure

2016-10-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 10/24/16 at 02:11pm, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On m68k/ARAnyM, test_rhashtable fails with: >> >> Test failed: thread 0 returned: -4 >> >> (-4 = -EINTR) > > The error is returned by kthread_stop(), I suspect we are running

Re: concurrent rhashtable test failure

2016-10-26 Thread Thomas Graf
On 10/24/16 at 02:11pm, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Phil, > > On m68k/ARAnyM, test_rhashtable fails with: > > Test failed: thread 0 returned: -4 > > (-4 = -EINTR) The error is returned by kthread_stop(), I suspect we are running into this: static int kthread(void *_create) { [..

Re: concurrent rhashtable test failure

2016-10-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Phil Sutter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:11:32PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On m68k/ARAnyM, test_rhashtable fails with: >> >> Test failed: thread 0 returned: -4 >> >> (-4 = -EINTR) > > How reproducible is this? I wonder why out of the ten thread

Re: concurrent rhashtable test failure

2016-10-26 Thread Phil Sutter
Hi Geert, On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:11:32PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On m68k/ARAnyM, test_rhashtable fails with: > > Test failed: thread 0 returned: -4 > > (-4 = -EINTR) How reproducible is this? I wonder why out of the ten threads only the first one fails. > I traced this back

concurrent rhashtable test failure

2016-10-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Phil, On m68k/ARAnyM, test_rhashtable fails with: Test failed: thread 0 returned: -4 (-4 = -EINTR) I traced this back to your commit f4a3e90ba5739cfd ("rhashtable-test: extend to test concurrency"), which added that part of the test. Diff of the test output between the failing commit an