From: Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:59:53 -0700
> It would be ideal if we'd have such an implementation in the next few
> months so that we, in theory, can check whether the text in the
> specification makes sense.
It seems this functionality is only relevant for re
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 10:58:18PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:11:01 -0700
>
> > There was no public mail. I asked RH engineering for proposals for
> > changes to the POSIX spec and Alan replied.
>
> Please do not discuss such
From: Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:11:01 -0700
> There was no public mail. I asked RH engineering for proposals for
> changes to the POSIX spec and Alan replied.
Please do not discuss such proposals only privately, especially when
the ramifications affect the enti
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 01:35:56PM -0400, Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 08:14:15PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > of operations. There are four ways where bind can fail:
> >
> > 1. unsufficient rights - nothing can help here
> > 2. there is no memory - async bin
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 08:14:15PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> of operations. There are four ways where bind can fail:
>
> 1. unsufficient rights - nothing can help here
> 2. there is no memory - async binding can not help here too, since it
> some memory just has to be allocated to sav
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 10:11:01AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > Could you point to the original Alan's proposal, I only found short note
> > (as in you original mail) at opengroup.org and failed to correctly
> > googlify it in the web.
>
> There w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Could you point to the original Alan's proposal, I only found short note
> (as in you original mail) at opengroup.org and failed to correctly
> googlify it in the web.
There was no public mail. I asked RH engineering for pro
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 09:21:06AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > So, did I understand you correctly, that you want to introduce network
> > AIO here? (for example on behalf of work queue or something else?)
>
> See Alan's mail. All this was his pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> So, did I understand you correctly, that you want to introduce network
> AIO here? (for example on behalf of work queue or something else?)
See Alan's mail. All this was his proposal, I just got it accepted
upstream.
The pr
Hi Ulrich.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:59:53PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Some time back Alan asked about adding O_NONBLOCK support to bind in the
> POSIX spec. I brought this up and the following text will be in the
> next revision of the POSIX spec:
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some time back Alan asked about adding O_NONBLOCK support to bind in the
POSIX spec. I brought this up and the following text will be in the
next revision of the POSIX spec:
===
If the socket address cannot be assigned immediately
11 matches
Mail list logo
