Ian McDonald wrote:
On 3/23/06, Mark Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand that timed intervals between individual packets is not
realistic in general. What I have in mind is a fixed granularity
transmission timer, where packets are assigned to buckets, and
transmitted one bucket p
> The qdiscs would ideally exist at the layer 2 / layer 3 boundary like
> existing qdiscs, but the problem is getting the scheduling parameters down
> that far. Perhaps a transport protocol could create a tagged route entry
> with the appropriate parameters, the routing layer could assign skbs to
On 3/23/06, Mark Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that timed intervals between individual packets is not
> realistic in general. What I have in mind is a fixed granularity
> transmission timer, where packets are assigned to buckets, and
> transmitted one bucket per timer expiration
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
The bigger problem is that too be effective rate control needs accurate
real time. Linux is doing better at real time, but still providing useful
high speed inter packet spacing is beyond the current capabilities. To get
around this I think most high speed 10G cards pro
> The bigger problem is that too be effective rate control needs accurate
> real time. Linux is doing better at real time, but still providing useful
> high speed inter packet spacing is beyond the current capabilities. To get
> around this I think most high speed 10G cards provide some form of rat
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:26:55 -0700
Mark Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:20:26 -0600, Saurabh Jain wrote:
>
>
> Hi All, I am trying to write a new rate based transport protocol in
> linux kernel (either as a module or directly within the kernel).
> Basically
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:20:26 -0600, Saurabh Jain wrote:
Hi All, I am trying to write a new rate based transport protocol in
linux kernel (either as a module or directly within the kernel).
Basically it would be similar to UDP but with features like dynamic
rate control, connection an
One Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:37:38 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
On 3/13/06, Saurabh Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to write a new rate based transport protocol in linux
> kernel (either as a module or directly within the kernel). Basically
>
On 3/13/06, Saurabh Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to write a new rate based transport protocol in linux
> kernel (either as a module or directly within the kernel). Basically
> it would be similar to UDP but with features like dynamic rate
> control, connection and state
Hi All,
I am trying to write a new rate based transport protocol in linux
kernel (either as a module or directly within the kernel). Basically
it would be similar to UDP but with features like dynamic rate
control, connection and state management, error control like TCP. Is
there any established f
10 matches
Mail list logo
