On Tuesday 25 July 2006 00:34, Rick Jones wrote:
> That TOE/iWARP could end-up being precluded by NAT seems so ironic from a
> POE2E
> standpoint.
Yes, it's sad, but reality unfortunately.
There is even precedent: the VJ stateless TW recycling scheme also
turned out to not work because of NAT
From: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:34:30 -0700
> That TOE/iWARP could end-up being precluded by NAT seems so ironic
> from a POE2E standpoint.
To be honest we do not have a pure end to end internet, and some of
our failed experiments in the past prove this :-)
For exa
That TOE/iWARP could end-up being precluded by NAT seems so ironic from a POE2E
standpoint.
rick jones
"Purity Of End To END"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordom
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:11:31 +1000
> 5) RDMA over TCP on the receive side is offloaded into the NIC. This
>allows the NIC to directly place data into the application's buffer.
>
>We're starting to have a little bit of a problem because it means th
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 18:17 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:25:44PM -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
> >
> > Some IP networking is involved for this. IP addresses and port numbers
> > are used by the RDMA Connection Manager. The motivation for this was
> > two-fold, I think:
> >
>
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:25:44PM -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
>
> Some IP networking is involved for this. IP addresses and port numbers
> are used by the RDMA Connection Manager. The motivation for this was
> two-fold, I think:
>
> 1) to simplify the connection setup model. The IB CM model was
Great summation. Comments in-line...
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 18:11 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:53:20AM +, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > What I am saying, however, is that we need to understand the
> > technology and the hooks you guys want before we put any of it in.
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:53:20AM +, David Miller wrote:
>
> What I am saying, however, is that we need to understand the
> technology and the hooks you guys want before we put any of it in.
Yes indeed.
Here is what I've understood so far so let's see if we can start building
a censensus.
