Rick Jones wrote:
Majumder, Rajib wrote:
Let's say we have 2 uniprocessor hosts connected back to back. Is
there any possibility of an out-of-order scenario on recv?
Your application should be written on the assumption that it is
possible, regardless of the specifics of the hosts involved, h
Majumder, Rajib wrote:
Let's say we have 2 uniprocessor hosts connected back to back. Is
there any possibility of an out-of-order scenario on recv?
Your application should be written on the assumption that it is
possible, regardless of the specifics of the hosts involved, however
unlikely th
On 9/21/06, Majumder, Rajib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does this mean if we have 2 hosts connected back to back (there's no network
device in between), sequence is guaranteed even in UDP?
I think if you're trying to make the packets appear in order you need
to untie the Gordian knot http://en.
ECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDP Out 0f Sequence
From: "Majumder, Rajib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:50:17 +0800
> Does this mean if we have 2 hosts connected back to back (there's no
> network device in between), se
From: "Majumder, Rajib" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:50:17 +0800
> Does this mean if we have 2 hosts connected back to back (there's no
> network device in between), sequence is guaranteed even in UDP?
Not true. Even for back to back systems SMP can cause packets
to be delivered
27;
Subject: Re: UDP Out 0f Sequence
Majumder, Rajib wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I write UDP datagrams 1,2 and 3 to network and if the receiver
> receives in order 2,1, and 3, where can the sequence get changed? Is it
> at the source stack, network transit or destination stack?
Yes. :)
Majumder, Rajib wrote:
Hi,
If I write UDP datagrams 1,2 and 3 to network and if the receiver
receives in order 2,1, and 3, where can the sequence get changed? Is it
at the source stack, network transit or destination stack?
Yes. :)
Although network transit is by far the most likely case. Des
network transit. different datagrams might go through different
routes, hence the out-of-sequence arrival.
On 9/20/06, Majumder, Rajib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
If I write UDP datagrams 1,2 and 3 to network and if the receiver receives in
order 2,1, and 3, where can the sequence get chang
Hi,
If I write UDP datagrams 1,2 and 3 to network and if the receiver receives in
order 2,1, and 3, where can the sequence get changed? Is it at the source
stack, network transit or destination stack?
Any reply is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Rajib
==
