Re: [PATCH] TCP slow start: comments and cleanup

From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:57:00 -0700 > Add more comments to describe our version of tcp_slow_start(). > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks Stephen. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev"

[PATCH] TCP slow start: comments and cleanup

Add more comments to describe our version of tcp_slow_start(). Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c | 40 ++-- 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c i

Re: TCP slow start

I am posting this again. I would really appreciate if somebody can answer this. I am beating myself with no success in getting to the root of this mystery. TCP still stays in slow start even though snd_cwnd >= snd_ssthresh and moves to CA only when there has been a packet loss. Can anybody confirm

TCP slow start

Hi All, Looking at the TCP stack code it seems that if the variable snd_cwnd > snd_ssthresh, TCP would move to congestion avoidance. Is that correct? Are there any other constraints as far as linux implementation goes? Will that condition hold even if there has been no packet drop or dup acks rece