From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:05:17 +0200 (EET)
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/tcptest/tcptest.git
Thanks a lot Ilpo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:23:12 -0800
>
> > Tools and scripts for testing that generate graphs are at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tcptest/tcptest
>
> Did you move it somewhere else?
>
> [EMAIL PROTE
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:23:12 -0800
> Tools and scripts for testing that generate graphs are at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tcptest/tcptest
Did you move it somewhere else?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/GIT$ git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 01:18:28 +0200 (EET)
>
> > On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > > I assume you're using something like carefully crafted printk's,
> > > kprobes, or even ad-hoc statistic counte
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:23:12 -0800
> Tools and scripts for testing that generate graphs are at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tcptest/tcptest
I know about this, I'm just curious what exactly Ilpo is
using :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: s
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:33:46 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 01:18:28 +0200 (EET)
>
> > On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > > I assume you're using something like carefully crafted printk's,
> > >
Em Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:20:58AM -0800, David Miller escreveu:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:33:38 -0500
>
> > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 08:53:07 -0800
> > Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > it occurred to me that we might want to do somethin
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 09:03:43PM -0800, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I think this work is very different.
>
> When I say "state" I mean something more significant than
> CLOSE, ESTABLISHED, etc. which is what Samir's patches are
> tracking.
>
> I'm talking about all of the sequenc
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 01:18:28 +0200 (EET)
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> > I assume you're using something like carefully crafted printk's,
> > kprobes, or even ad-hoc statistic counters. That's what I used to do
> > :-)
>
> No, that's n
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:33:38 -0500
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 08:53:07 -0800
> Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > it occurred to me that we might want to do something
> > > like a state change event generator.
> >
> > This could be a basis for
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 17:48:43 +0300
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 09:11:01AM -0500, John Heffner ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > >Maybe if we want to get really fancy we can have some more-expensive
> > >debug mode where detailed specific events get genera
From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:11:01 -0500
> FWIW, sounds similar to what these guys are doing with SIFTR for FreeBSD:
> http://caia.swin.edu.au/urp/newtcp/tools.html
> http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/070824A/CAIA-TR-070824A.pdf
Yes, my proposal is very similar t
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 00:15:49 +0200 (EET)
"Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 08:53:07 -0800
> > Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > it occurred to me that we might want to do something
> > > > like a st
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
> Ilpo, I was pondering the kind of debugging one does to find
> congestion control issues and even SACK bugs and it's currently too
> painful because there is no standard way to track state changes.
That's definately true.
> I assume you're using somethin
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 08:53:07 -0800
> Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > it occurred to me that we might want to do something
> > > like a state change event generator.
> >
> > This could be a basis for an interesting TCP
> > performance
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 08:53:07 -0800
Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it occurred to me that we might want to do something
> > like a state change event generator.
>
> This could be a basis for an interesting TCP
> performance tester.
That is what tcpprobe does but it isn't detailed enou
> it occurred to me that we might want to do something
> like a state change event generator.
This could be a basis for an interesting TCP
performance tester.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 09:11:01AM -0500, John Heffner ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>> >Maybe if we want to get really fancy we can have some more-expensive
>> >debug mode where detailed specific events get generated via some
>> >macros we ca
Hi.
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 09:11:01AM -0500, John Heffner ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> >Maybe if we want to get really fancy we can have some more-expensive
> >debug mode where detailed specific events get generated via some
> >macros we can scatter all over the place. This won't be useful
> >f
David Miller wrote:
Ilpo, I was pondering the kind of debugging one does to find
congestion control issues and even SACK bugs and it's currently too
painful because there is no standard way to track state changes.
I assume you're using something like carefully crafted printk's,
kprobes, or even
Ilpo, I was pondering the kind of debugging one does to find
congestion control issues and even SACK bugs and it's currently too
painful because there is no standard way to track state changes.
I assume you're using something like carefully crafted printk's,
kprobes, or even ad-hoc statistic coun
21 matches
Mail list logo
