> Please also tell me what legacy application could actually
> use this thing when BSD itself doesn't even implement it?
Some version of java seems to. I see a lot of:
ioctl32(java:30851): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(8938){00} arg(bfbb87c4) on
socket:[334628709]
But just rejecting it is probabl
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:12:26 -0700
> Trivial implementation of SIOCGIFCOUNT.
> If you search the archives, this was suggested and rejected
> 6 years ago. But there maybe legacy Unix applications that
> could actually use it.
Trivial implementation of SIOCGIFCOUNT.
If you search the archives, this was suggested and rejected
6 years ago. But there maybe legacy Unix applications that
could actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/core/dev.c
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:48:52 +0200
> On Saturday 21 April 2007 00:41:33 David Miller wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:04:51 +0200
> >
> > > 0x8938 is SIOCGIFCOUNT.
On Saturday 21 April 2007 00:41:33 David Miller wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:04:51 +0200
>
> > 0x8938 is SIOCGIFCOUNT. As far as I can see it is only defined in
> > sockios.h, but not implemented?
> >
> > Should
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:04:51 +0200
> 0x8938 is SIOCGIFCOUNT. As far as I can see it is only defined in
> sockios.h, but not implemented?
>
> Should it be removed from the include file or implemented?
Unless we can be %100 certain not on
