On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:49:04PM -0700, Xie He wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 7:13 AM Madhuparna Bhowmik
> wrote:
> >
> > Sure, I had a look at it and since you are already working on fixing
> > this driver, don't think there is a need for a patch to fix the
> > particular race condition bug.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 7:13 AM Madhuparna Bhowmik
wrote:
>
> Sure, I had a look at it and since you are already working on fixing
> this driver, don't think there is a need for a patch to fix the
> particular race condition bug. This bug was found by the Linux driver
> verification project and my
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 12:12:01PM -0700, Xie He wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 8:28 AM Madhuparna Bhowmik
> wrote:
> >
> > sl->xhead is modified in both x25_asy_change_mtu() and
> > x25_asy_write_wakeup(). However, sl->lock is not held in
> > x25_asy_write_wakeup(). So, I am not sure if it is i
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 8:28 AM Madhuparna Bhowmik
wrote:
>
> sl->xhead is modified in both x25_asy_change_mtu() and
> x25_asy_write_wakeup(). However, sl->lock is not held in
> x25_asy_write_wakeup(). So, I am not sure if it is indeed possible to
> have a race between these two functions. If it i
Hello,
I have the following doubt:
sl->xhead is modified in both x25_asy_change_mtu() and
x25_asy_write_wakeup(). However, sl->lock is not held in
x25_asy_write_wakeup(). So, I am not sure if it is indeed possible to
have a race between these two functions. If it is possible that these
two functi
