On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:04:21PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> There _should_ be some #ifdeffable thing which is being passed to cpp when
> we run sparse (but I'm not sure what it is).
#ifdef __CHECKER__
(See include/linux/compiler.h, this is how we implement __user & friends)
Dave
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:33:46 -0700 James Ketrenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:51:41 -0700 James Ketrenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> * make C=2 CF=-Wall will complain if you use ARRAY_SIZE on global data
> */
> #define GLOBAL_
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:51:41 -0700 James Ketrenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
* make C=2 CF=-Wall will complain if you use ARRAY_SIZE on global data
*/
#define GLOBAL_ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
>>> This is identical to ARRAY_SIZE.
>>>
>>> An
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:35:34 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:51:41 -0700 James Ketrenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > >> * make C=2 CF=-Wall will complain if you use ARRAY_SIZE on global data
> > >> */
> > >> #define GLOBAL_ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
>
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:51:41 -0700 James Ketrenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> * make C=2 CF=-Wall will complain if you use ARRAY_SIZE on global data
> >> */
> >> #define GLOBAL_ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
> >
> > This is identical to ARRAY_SIZE.
> >
> > And if there's some
Andrew Morton wrote:
> i386 allmodconfig isn't that hard, guys.
>
...
> drivers/net/wireless/mac80211/iwlwifi/iwl-4965.c:2050: warning: left shift
> count >= width of type
My mistake. I ran that and even fixed the warning at one point... anyway,
I've committed a patch to our tree to fix the
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:12:03PM -0700, James Ketrenos wrote:
>> Yes, we certainly don't want a driver to be "near mainline" that does
>> things that the rest of the kernel and other drivers are doing. We should
>> force them to stay out-of-tree until any and everyth
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:12:03PM -0700, James Ketrenos wrote:
> Yes, we certainly don't want a driver to be "near mainline" that does
> things that the rest of the kernel and other drivers are doing. We should
> force them to stay out-of-tree until any and everything is resolved.
> Heaven fo
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:12:03 -0700
James Ketrenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:06:14AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >> Please, don't anybody dare think about thinking about letting this anywhere
> >> near mainline until it has had a thor
John W. Linville wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:06:14AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Please, don't anybody dare think about thinking about letting this anywhere
near mainline until it has had a thorough review. Or at least, a little bit
of review.
Don't worry -- I assure you that everyone
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:06:14AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Please, don't anybody dare think about thinking about letting this anywhere
> near mainline until it has had a thorough review. Or at least, a little bit
> of review.
Don't worry -- I assure you that everyone is aware of the issues
11 matches
Mail list logo
