Re: virtio-net: why not always to set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT

Linhaifeng writes: > On 2015/6/4 9:13, Rusty Russell wrote: >> Linhaifeng writes: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm a newbie and have a question about vring_new_virtqueue function. >>> >>> Why we set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT when no callbacks? >>> I think we should set avail->flags to VRING_A

Re: virtio-net: why not always to set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT

On 2015/6/4 9:13, Rusty Russell wrote: > Linhaifeng writes: >> Hi, >> >> I'm a newbie and have a question about vring_new_virtqueue function. >> >> Why we set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT when no callbacks? >> I think we should set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT even if

Re: virtio-net: why not always to set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT

Linhaifeng writes: > Hi, > > I'm a newbie and have a question about vring_new_virtqueue function. > > Why we set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT when no callbacks? > I think we should set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT even if no > callbacks. Hi Linhaifeng, Not su