Hi Dave,
> > > > > How do you produce these oopses, because I've never seen them.
> > > > http://people.redhat.com/davej/sfuzz.c
> > > > (it ran for a few hours before it caused the oopses)
> > >
> > > Any options to make it appear faster?
> >
> > I just ran it with no arguments.
>
> I w
Hi Dave,
> > > > How do you produce these oopses, because I've never seen them.
> > > http://people.redhat.com/davej/sfuzz.c
> > > (it ran for a few hours before it caused the oopses)
> >
> > Any options to make it appear faster?
>
> I just ran it with no arguments.
I was able to reprodu
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:19:36AM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> > > > Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
> > > > (The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
> > >
> > > does 2.6.15-1.1929_FC5smp equals 2.6.16-rc2-git?
> >
> > yes.
>
> not additional Fedora spe
Hi Dave,
> > > Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
> > > (The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
> >
> > does 2.6.15-1.1929_FC5smp equals 2.6.16-rc2-git?
>
> yes.
not additional Fedora specific patches? It is a plain vanilla kernel?
> > How do you produce these oopses, because I'v
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:46:43AM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
> > (The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
>
> does 2.6.15-1.1929_FC5smp equals 2.6.16-rc2-git?
yes.
> How do you produce these oopses, because I've never seen them.
http://pe
Hi Dave,
> Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
> (The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
does 2.6.15-1.1929_FC5smp equals 2.6.16-rc2-git?
How do you produce these oopses, because I've never seen them.
Regards
Marcel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev"
