Re: tcp_slow_start_after_idle

2006-06-14 Thread David Miller
From: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:46:58 -0700 > Also, does the congestion window "time out" or does it decay? The modification made to the cwnd is indeed a decay function, but the event is a time out, and it is also termed a restart in other writings and contexts. I

Re: tcp_slow_start_after_idle

2006-06-14 Thread David Miller
From: Zach Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:09:52 -0700 > Nice, thanks for the heads-up. I'll pass the notice on to the guys who > were asking about this in that thread. Which Wall Street brokerage firm was it? :-) That's basically who wants this stuff, people doing financial

Re: tcp_slow_start_after_idle

2006-06-14 Thread Zach Brown
David Miller wrote: > Bringing back up this old topic: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=114564962420171&w=2 > > I've decided to add this tunable to the net-2.6.18 tree, patch below. Nice, thanks for the heads-up. I'll pass the notice on to the guys who were asking about

Re: tcp_slow_start_after_idle

2006-06-14 Thread Rick Jones
+tcp_slow_start_after_idle - BOOLEAN + If set, provide RFC2861 behavior and time out the congestion + window after an idle period. An idle period is defined at + the current RTO. If unset, the congestion window will not + be timed out after an idle period. + Default