On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:47:34PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:50:18 -0700
>
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:53:19 -0400
> > Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I did the optimistic dad sysctl, and have no strict use for
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:50:18 -0700
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:53:19 -0400
> Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I did the optimistic dad sysctl, and have no strict use for numbered
> > sysctls (I
> > was just unaware of the policy). I'll work up
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:53:19 -0400
Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did the optimistic dad sysctl, and have no strict use for numbered sysctls
> (I
> was just unaware of the policy). I'll work up a patch to use
> register_sysclt_table with CTL_UNNUMBERED in the next few days.
I don't
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:06:34 -0600
>
>> David for clarity do you happen to know of anyone using binary
>> sysctl values?
>
> None at all.
>
>> In particular is there any reason not to use CTL_UNNUMBERED
>>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:06:34 -0600
> David for clarity do you happen to know of anyone using binary
> sysctl values?
None at all.
> In particular is there any reason not to use CTL_UNNUMBERED
> for new networking sysctls?
Neil said he would send me
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:29:24 -0700
>
>>
>> I note that the networking tree is adding new sysctls:
>>
>> <<< HEAD/include/linux/sysctl.h
>> NET_IPV6_ACCEPT_SOURCE_ROUTE=25,
>> ===
>> NE
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:29:24 -0700
>
> I note that the networking tree is adding new sysctls:
>
> <<< HEAD/include/linux/sysctl.h
> NET_IPV6_ACCEPT_SOURCE_ROUTE=25,
> ===
> NET_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD=24,
> NET_IPV6_ACCEPT_SO
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:45:19PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I note that the networking tree is adding new sysctls:
> >
> > <<< HEAD/include/linux/sysctl.h
> > NET_IPV6_ACCEPT_SOURCE_ROUTE=25,
> > ===
> > NET_IPV6_OPTI
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I note that the networking tree is adding new sysctls:
>
> <<< HEAD/include/linux/sysctl.h
> NET_IPV6_ACCEPT_SOURCE_ROUTE=25,
> ===
> NET_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD=24,
> NET_IPV6_ACCEPT_SOURCE_ROUTE=25,
/include/linux/s
