Ben-san, Jens-san
Thanks for your comments and advices.
First, we should apologize to you that some troubles which we informed
about spidernet auto-negotiation are caused by our mistake.
We used wrong MACRO for "advertise" variable to
phy->def->ops->setup_aneg().
We will post the revised patch f
> We use bcm5461. There is a possibility that we don't know the appropriate
> setting which is applicable for both type of switches.
Have you tested the existing 54xx code in sungem_phy.c ? We use that
with 5462 at least in K2 and all sorts of 54xx chips and it works
fine... Just setup the right
Jens-san,
Thanks for your comments.
>Ishizaki-san,
>
>> This patch partially works on celleb but remains
>> following several problems.
>> 1. It doesn't recover once an ethernet cable which is
>>connected to a spider_net card is unpluged.
>
>My understanding is that you are using the LINK i
On Friday 26 January 2007 9:21 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Can't we have a device-tree property indicating wether to use fiber or
> copper ?
Well, yes, I am sure we could, but what would be the benefit of doing so
if we can get the same information dynamically ?
Jens
-
To unsubscribe fr
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 14:09 +0100, Jens Osterkamp wrote:
> This patch modifies the patch submitted by Kou Ishizaki to make it work on the
> blade (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=116593424505539&w=2).
> Unfortunately I dont have access to a Celleb so I cannot test it there.
>
> The
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:09:29PM +0100, Jens Osterkamp wrote:
> This patch modifies the patch submitted by Kou Ishizaki to make it work on the
> blade (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=116593424505539&w=2).
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/spider_net.c
> + if (card->aneg_count > SP
