Juniper Business Use Only
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ron Bonica
>> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 10:50 AM
>> To: David Ahern ; Zachary Dodds ;
>> Ishaan Gandhi
>> Cc: Andreas Roeseler ; David Miller
>> ; Network Development ; Stephen
&
...@cs.hmc.edu
Subject: Re: rfc5837 and rfc8335
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:40 PM Ron Bonica wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Andreas reminds me that you may have the same questions regarding RFC
> 8335.
>
> The practice of assigning globally reac
> release and on other platforms soon after that.
>
>
>Ron
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Ahern
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 11:19 PM
>
Hemminger ; Willem de Bruijn
; juniperos...@cs.hmc.edu
Subject: RE: rfc5837 and rfc8335
David,
Juniper networks is motivated to promote RFC 5837 now, as opposed to eleven
years ago, because the deployment of parallel links between routers is becoming
more common
Large network operators
; David Miller
; Network Development ; Stephen
Hemminger ; Willem de Bruijn
; juniperos...@cs.hmc.edu
Subject: Re: rfc5837 and rfc8335
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
On 3/23/21 10:39 AM, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> The rationale for RFC 8335 can be found in Sect
On 3/23/21 10:39 AM, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> The rationale for RFC 8335 can be found in Section 5.0 of that document.
> Currently, ICMP ECHO and ECHO RESPONSE messages can be used to determine
> the liveness of some interfaces. However, they cannot determine the
> liveness of:
>
> What is the motivation for adding support for these RFCs? Is the push
> from a company or academia (e.g., a CS project)?
Yes, these patches (RFC 8335 and 5837) were produced as a result of a
collaboration between Juniper Networks and Harvey Mudd College.
Let me loop in our advisor, Zach Dodds,
