Re: rewriting skb->truesize... good or bad idea

2006-10-03 Thread David Miller
From: Vlad Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:46:42 -0400 > David Miller wrote: > > If, on the other hand, you know you have exclusive access to the > > skb and there are no other references, setting skb->truesize can > > be OK. However setting it to sizeof(struct sk_buff) doe

Re: rewriting skb->truesize... good or bad idea

2006-10-02 Thread Vlad Yasevich
Hi David Thanks for the answer. David Miller wrote: > From: Vlad Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:16:57 -0400 > >> I've attached the patch, in case people want to look at the code. >> >> However, we question if this is a good idea or if this is going to break >> things...

Re: rewriting skb->truesize... good or bad idea

2006-09-29 Thread David Miller
From: Vlad Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:16:57 -0400 > I've attached the patch, in case people want to look at the code. > > However, we question if this is a good idea or if this is going to break > things... Modification of skb->truesize is very dangerous and is only l