Hey,
> you want per-packet overhead instead of deferring the overhead event
> based updates? network events tend to be much less frequent than
> sending/forwarding packets
Depending on performance cost and complexity cost of options.
--
++ytti
On 3/19/18 12:58 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Hey David,
>
>> The Linux stack does not flatten routes when inserting into the FIB.
>> Recursion is expected to be done a routing daemon such as bgp which will
>> be able to handle updates as the network changes.
>
> Are you saying that routing protocol wo
Hey David,
> The Linux stack does not flatten routes when inserting into the FIB.
> Recursion is expected to be done a routing daemon such as bgp which will
> be able to handle updates as the network changes.
Are you saying that routing protocol would observe the next-hop
change, then update the
On 3/19/18 1:42 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I believe Linux does not support recursive static routes, is this correct?
The Linux stack does not flatten routes when inserting into the FIB.
Recursion is expected to be done a routing daemon such as bgp which will
be able to handle updates as the network c
