On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:58:27 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 11/15/20 2:39 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 17:35:01 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >> Two invalid fixes tags here, do you want to respin or should I pull?
>
> Let me respin this. It'll have the new date tag of
On 11/15/20 5:58 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 11/15/20 2:39 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 17:35:01 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> Two invalid fixes tags here, do you want to respin or should I pull?
>
> Let me respin this. It'll have the new date tag of today (15th).
It's
On 11/15/20 2:39 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 17:35:01 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Two invalid fixes tags here, do you want to respin or should I pull?
Let me respin this. It'll have the new date tag of today (15th).
> Just realized you probably have these objects in your tr
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 18:33:44 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Anant Thazhemadam contributed two patches for the AF_CAN that prevent
> potential
> access of uninitialized member in can_rcv() and canfd_rcv().
>
> The next patch is by Alejandro Concepcion Rodriguez and changes can_restart()
> to use
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 17:35:01 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Two invalid fixes tags here, do you want to respin or should I pull?
Just realized you probably have these objects in your tree so it'd be
useful if I told you which ones ;)
Commit: be719591ede2 ("can: m_can: Fix freeing of can device fro
