Re: off-by-one in DecodeQ931

2016-06-12 Thread Toby DiPasquale
Attached is the patch generated with git format-patch. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:35:55PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: >> Toby DiPasquale wrote: >> > Is this latest patch OK? >> >> Yes, I don't know why it wasn't applied yet. >> >> Pa

Re: off-by-one in DecodeQ931

2016-06-06 Thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:35:55PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Toby DiPasquale wrote: > > Is this latest patch OK? > > Yes, I don't know why it wasn't applied yet. > > Pablo? This doesn't apply. $ git am /tmp/off-by-one-in-DecodeQ931.patch -s Applying: off-by-one in DecodeQ931 error: patc

Re: off-by-one in DecodeQ931

2016-06-06 Thread Florian Westphal
Toby DiPasquale wrote: > Is this latest patch OK? Yes, I don't know why it wasn't applied yet. Pablo?

Re: off-by-one in DecodeQ931

2016-06-06 Thread Toby DiPasquale
Is this latest patch OK? On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Toby DiPasquale wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Florian Westphal wrote: >> -> sz (size_t) will underflow here >> >> I'd suggest to change the if (sz < 1) to if (sz < 2) to >> resolve this, the while loop below has to be taken an

Re: off-by-one in DecodeQ931

2016-05-20 Thread Toby DiPasquale
I'm a bit new to this; is this patch OK? On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Toby DiPasquale wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Florian Westphal wrote: >> -> sz (size_t) will underflow here >> >> I'd suggest to change the if (sz < 1) to if (sz < 2) to >> resolve this, the while loop below ha

Re: off-by-one in DecodeQ931

2016-05-02 Thread Toby DiPasquale
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Florian Westphal wrote: > -> sz (size_t) will underflow here > > I'd suggest to change the if (sz < 1) to if (sz < 2) to > resolve this, the while loop below has to be taken anyway. Thanks, Florian! Updated patch below: Signed-off-by: Toby DiPasquale diff --gi

Re: off-by-one in DecodeQ931

2016-04-25 Thread Florian Westphal
Toby DiPasquale wrote: > I was reviewing the H.323 conntrack helper in the kernel when I came > across what appears to be an off-by-one error in the DecodeQ931 > function. The MessageType field of the Q931 record is assigned and p > is incremented, but the corresponding decrement to sz is missing,