David Miller wrote:
From: Urs Thuermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 Oct 2007 23:13:42 +0200
Last week I have sent another version of our patch series for PF_CAN.
The changes after the last review feedback were only cosmetics.
Do you have any plans with that code for this or the next releas
From: Urs Thuermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 Oct 2007 23:13:42 +0200
> Last week I have sent another version of our patch series for PF_CAN.
> The changes after the last review feedback were only cosmetics.
>
> Do you have any plans with that code for this or the next release?
I think PF_CAN
Hallo Dave,
> 9.1MB, 739 changesets, keep those patches flowing!
Last week I have sent another version of our patch series for PF_CAN.
The changes after the last review feedback were only cosmetics.
Do you have any plans with that code for this or the next release?
Regards,
urs
-
To unsubscribe
From: "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:46:49 -0400
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:33:44PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> > John, one patch didn't go in cleanly after I removed the
> > Z1211 driver. I put it here for your consideration so it
> > doesn't get lost:
> >
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:33:44PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> John, one patch didn't go in cleanly after I removed the
> Z1211 driver. I put it here for your consideration so it
> doesn't get lost:
>
> http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/0433-Z1211-Fix-TX-status-reports.patch
>
> What probabl
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:33 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/0433-Z1211-Fix-TX-status-reports.patch
>
> What probably needs to happen is some other changes that
> were in z1211 need to go into the non-mac80211 driver and
> then this patch applies correctly.
>
> I
From: "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:44:32 -0400
> Sorry, I sent the patch through Jeff.
>
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/wireless-2.6/upstream-jgarzik/0010-rtl8187-remove-IEEE80211_HW_DATA_NULLFUNC_ACK.patch
>
> But, it sounds
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:21:29PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:58:12 +0200
>
> > Huh? I'm fairly sure I sent a patch to remove it from that driver, no
> > idea where it got lost. FWIW, you can simply delete the "|
> > IEEE80211_H
From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:58:12 +0200
> Huh? I'm fairly sure I sent a patch to remove it from that driver, no
> idea where it got lost. FWIW, you can simply delete the "|
> IEEE80211_HW_DATA_NULLFUNC_ACK" part.
It might have been a mis-merge between John an
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 23:19 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> CC drivers/net/wireless/rtl8187_dev.o
> drivers/net/wireless/rtl8187_dev.c: In function ‘rtl8187_probe’:
> drivers/net/wireless/rtl8187_dev.c:610: error:
> ‘IEEE80211_HW_DATA_NULLFUNC_ACK’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> drive
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:47 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:41 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:34:00 -0700
> >
> > > On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 17:59 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > I pushed this fix into net-2.6
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:41 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:34:00 -0700
>
> > On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 17:59 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > I pushed this fix into net-2.6.24 just now, thanks again.
> >
> > This tree doesn't compile for
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
> I could have sworn I did, thanks for catching that I'll fix it
> up.
I pushed this fix into net-2.6.24 just now, thanks again.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a
From: "Michael Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:33:19 -0700
> It seems that tg3 and bnx2 still have the tx locking changes. David,
> didn't you revert those changes a few weeks ago?
I could have sworn I did, thanks for catching that I'll fix it
up.
-
To unsubscribe from this l
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 17:25 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> The new NAPI struct patch is in there, one caveat of the new
> behavior is that in drivers that conditionalize NAPI support
> we can't be lazy and do the napi_{enable,disable}() outside
> of the ifdefs any longer. I tried to audit all the dr
15 matches
Mail list logo
