On 05/22/2015 11:16 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015, at 18:24, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
On 05/22/2015 08:35 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
I still wonder if we need to actually recheck the condition and not
simply break out of unix_stream_data_wait:
We return to the unix_strea
On Fri, May 22, 2015, at 18:24, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> On 05/22/2015 08:35 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > I still wonder if we need to actually recheck the condition and not
> > simply break out of unix_stream_data_wait:
> >
> > We return to the unix_stream_recvmsg loop and recheck the
> > sk_r
On 05/22/2015 08:35 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
I still wonder if we need to actually recheck the condition and not
simply break out of unix_stream_data_wait:
We return to the unix_stream_recvmsg loop and recheck the
sk_receive_queue. At this point sk_receive_queue is not really protected
wi
On Fr, 2015-05-22 at 07:51 -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> On 05/22/2015 02:50 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > On Do, 2015-05-21 at 09:25 -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> >> got a rare NULL pointer dereference in clear_bit
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn
> >> ---
> >> net/unix/af_unix.c | 5 +
On 05/22/2015 02:50 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Do, 2015-05-21 at 09:25 -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
got a rare NULL pointer dereference in clear_bit
Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/uni
On Do, 2015-05-21 at 09:25 -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> got a rare NULL pointer dereference in clear_bit
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn
> ---
> net/unix/af_unix.c | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index 5266ea7..37a8925 1006
