On 2018年05月16日 15:40, Andrei Vagin wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:32:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月16日 15:12, Andrei Vagin wrote:
Hi Jason,
I think the problem is in "tun: hold a tun socket during ptr_ring_cleanup".
Pls take a look at the attached patch.
Yes.
It looks to me
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:32:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年05月16日 15:12, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > I think the problem is in "tun: hold a tun socket during ptr_ring_cleanup".
> >
> > Pls take a look at the attached patch.
>
> Yes.
>
> It looks to me it's not nec
On 2018年05月16日 15:12, Andrei Vagin wrote:
Hi Jason,
I think the problem is in "tun: hold a tun socket during ptr_ring_cleanup".
Pls take a look at the attached patch.
Yes.
It looks to me it's not necessary to take extra refcnt during release,
we can just do the cleanup at __tun_detach().
Hi Jason,
I think the problem is in "tun: hold a tun socket during ptr_ring_cleanup".
Pls take a look at the attached patch.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:28:25PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> We run CRIU tests on linux-next regularly and today we caught this bug:
>
> https://travis-ci.org/avagin/
