Re: instrumentation for TCP MTU probing

2006-02-09 Thread David S. Miller
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:20:39 +1100 > David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . > > But, thinking about this some more, it might actually be best to just > > add them anyways to "TcpExt: " and get netstat's limitation fixed. > > > > Any other opinions?

Re: instrumentation for TCP MTU probing

2006-02-06 Thread Herbert Xu
David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: . > But, thinking about this some more, it might actually be best to just > add them anyways to "TcpExt: " and get netstat's limitation fixed. > > Any other opinions? Use netlink? -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI

Re: instrumentation for TCP MTU probing

2006-02-05 Thread David S. Miller
From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:29:14 -0500 > This is a patch which adds instruments to the TCP MTU probing. It > breaks netstat -s because it extends the line length of > /proc/net/netstat past 1024 characters, so it is not safe to apply. > I'm sending it for refe