Feyd wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:16:21 +0200 (CEST)
Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you do find yourself needing to grow the skb, it can be done,
but it is not too efficient. Look at the 8021q vlan transmit
path code...it will insert it's 4 byte header in certain cases, and
has log
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:16:21 +0200 (CEST)
Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you do find yourself needing to grow the skb, it can be done,
> but it is not too efficient. Look at the 8021q vlan transmit
> path code...it will insert it's 4 byte header in certain cases, and
> has logic to gr
David S. Miller wrote:
From: Feyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:43:10 +0200
can I assume that hard_start_xmit will always get skbs with hard_header_len
reserved? I need two more bytes at the start of the packet and I'm getting
spurious panics in skb_push.
Typically, no. ->h
From: Feyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:43:10 +0200
> can I assume that hard_start_xmit will always get skbs with hard_header_len
> reserved? I need two more bytes at the start of the packet and I'm getting
> spurious panics in skb_push.
Typically, no. ->hard_start_xmit() has a
