Thanks Fabio.
On 10/21/2016 06:43 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
>
>> Reading the i.MX28 reference manual, it appears that this SoC doesn't
>> have the RACC bit, and I missed removal of the FEC_QUIRK_HAS_RACC flag.
>
> On MX28 the r
Hi Henri,
On 10/21/2016 06:39 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Hi Henri,
>
> On 10/21/2016 02:19 AM, Henri Roosen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Unfortunately commit-3ac72b7b63d5 "net: fec: align IP header in
>> hardware" breaks networking on an iMX28 system.
>>
>> The commit seems valid for iMX6, where it is teste
Hi Eric,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Reading the i.MX28 reference manual, it appears that this SoC doesn't
> have the RACC bit, and I missed removal of the FEC_QUIRK_HAS_RACC flag.
On MX28 the register is called HW_ENET_MAC_IPACCRXCONF.
I sent a patch that fixes the
Hi Henri,
On 10/21/2016 02:19 AM, Henri Roosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately commit-3ac72b7b63d5 "net: fec: align IP header in
> hardware" breaks networking on an iMX28 system.
>
> The commit seems valid for iMX6, where it is tested okay and solves the
> unaligned accesses.
>
> On iMX28 I stil
Hi Fabio,
On 10/21/2016 12:55 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Henri,
2016-10-21 7:19 GMT-02:00 Henri Roosen :
Hi,
Unfortunately commit-3ac72b7b63d5 "net: fec: align IP header in
hardware" breaks networking on an iMX28 system.
The commit seems valid for iMX6, where it is tested okay and solves th
Hi Henri,
2016-10-21 7:19 GMT-02:00 Henri Roosen :
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately commit-3ac72b7b63d5 "net: fec: align IP header in
> hardware" breaks networking on an iMX28 system.
>
> The commit seems valid for iMX6, where it is tested okay and solves the
> unaligned accesses.
>
> On iMX28 I still see
