John W. Linville wrote:
> So, did the patch below fix the problem? Should I apply it?
>
> John
John,
the patch would have worked, but I have sent a second one to the
list, which is based on Herbert's and has an assert to be able to test
the patch on x86.
You should be notify that the mac80211
> Chances are it does make progress however we may still have the
> general wireless/IP stack alignment issue that we are still discussing.
Yeah, it's still on my list. I'll make a patch to WARN_ON unaligned data
in a packet... although this is a bit complicated. ath5k actually had a
bug with thi
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 06:34:56PM +1100, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>
> OK... so I've applied patches left right and centre. As there have been
> a few, I'll in-line them all at the bottom of this email.
>
> The result is that there are no more unaligned access messages at all.
Good stuff! I was so
Hi again,
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:45:33PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
So, did the patch below fix the problem? Should I apply it?
I'm keen to find out the result too :)
Chances are it does make progress however we may still have the
general wireless/IP stack alignmen
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:45:33PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> So, did the patch below fix the problem? Should I apply it?
I'm keen to find out the result too :)
Chances are it does make progress however we may still have the
general wireless/IP stack alignment issue that we are still discu
So, did the patch below fix the problem? Should I apply it?
John
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 11:02:16PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 01:00:44PM +, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> >
> > It hasn't seemed to. I patched the source (confirming the patched lines
> > are in), compiled, in
Herbert Xu wrote:
> So please try the following patch (instead of the original one)
> which should fix all the unailgned accesses in do_rx.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
> Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~he
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 01:00:44PM +, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>
> It hasn't seemed to. I patched the source (confirming the patched lines
> are in), compiled, installed and rebooted to effect the changes. My
> zd1211rw modules timestamp indicates that I have an updated module:
Thanks for your q
> The problem is
> drivers/net/wireless/zd1211/zd_mac.c:update_qual_rssi().
> Specifically the compare_ether_addr() call
I don't believe this is true. Shaddy seems to back that up by the patch
not helping.
> Wireless folks, I would suggest we do some auditing of the
> compare_ether_addr() calls a
Hi David,
David Miller wrote:
Shaddy I attach a hack patch that you can use which should get
rid of the warnings.
It hasn't seemed to. I patched the source (confirming the patched lines
are in), compiled, installed and rebooted to effect the changes. My
zd1211rw modules timestamp indicates t
10 matches
Mail list logo
