Re: XFRM_MSG_NEWAE

2006-08-15 Thread jamal
On Tue, 2006-15-08 at 18:07 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think we need a way to tone this down, so that if there are no truly > > interested parties we don't do the km->notify work at all. > > Actually, we do turn it off if nobody is listening, thro

Re: XFRM_MSG_NEWAE

2006-08-15 Thread David Miller
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:07:31 +1000 > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think we need a way to tone this down, so that if there are no truly > > interested parties we don't do the km->notify work at all. > > Actually, we do turn it off if no

Re: XFRM_MSG_NEWAE

2006-08-15 Thread Herbert Xu
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we need a way to tone this down, so that if there are no truly > interested parties we don't do the km->notify work at all. Actually, we do turn it off if nobody is listening, through xfrm_aevent_is_on(). > Also it would be nice to add xfrm mon