Re: XFRM and IPv6 raw sockets and multicast

2007-12-04 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Hello. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:01:43 +0100), "Hugo Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > If we do really support it, if hdcincl is set, XFRM and other > > all extension header processes should be skipped, but they are > > not very clear at all so far. > > I under

Re: XFRM and IPv6 raw sockets and multicast

2007-12-04 Thread Hugo Santos
Hi, On Dec 4, 2007 4:52 PM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you mean by "ipv6 header"? If IPPROTO_RAW is set, we supply the ipv6 header, extensions and payload. > I think hdrincl is broken (and even, say, deprecated) on IPv6. By IPv6 you mean the protocol, or L

Re: XFRM and IPv6 raw sockets and multicast

2007-12-04 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Hello. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:27:50 +0100), "Hugo Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > The behavior is the same as in UDP, but ipv6_pinfo->saddr is not > usually set for these kind of sockets. I would say that if fl6_src is > any, it should be copied from the ipv6