On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
>
>> > May be I'm missing some posting but I don't see if
>> > the patch was tested successfully.
>> >
>> Hi Julian
>>
>> I've had this patch being tested
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Hi Cong
>
> I believe your patch makes a lot of sense, please submit it formally ?
>
I have been waiting for Subash's testing, since I myself never even run it.
Hello,
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
> > May be I'm missing some posting but I don't see if
> > the patch was tested successfully.
> >
> Hi Julian
>
> I've had this patch being tested for the last 3-4 days in our regression rack
> and I haven't seen the
May be I'm missing some posting but I don't see if
the patch was tested successfully.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov
Hi Julian
I've had this patch being tested for the last 3-4 days in our regression
rack
and I haven't seen the same issue being reproduced or even a related
crash
or l
Hello,
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> > wrote:
> > > We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
> > >
> > > It appears as if memory of th
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> wrote:
> > We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
> >
> > It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some path
> > and allocated
> > t
On 2017-09-08 10:10, Cong Wang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
wrote:
We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in
some path
and allocated
to ion driver. ion driver has als
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 10:19 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:16:53 -0700
>
> > On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> >> wrote:
> >> > We are seeing a possible use after
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:16:53 -0700
> On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
>> wrote:
>> > We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
>> >
>> > It appears as if memory of the __D
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> wrote:
> > We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
> >
> > It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some path
> > and allocated
> > t
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:12:09 -0700
Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:52:02 -0600
> > Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
> >
> >> We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
> >>
> >> It appears as if memory of
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:52:02 -0600
> Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
>
>> We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
>>
>> It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some
>> path and allocated
>
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
wrote:
> We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
>
> It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some path
> and allocated
> to ion driver. ion driver has also freed it. Finally the memory is
[ 3489.194392] __ion_alloc+0x180/0x988
I do not see the __ion_alloc function in my tree.
Hi David
This function seems to be defined in an Android specific change.
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/20a5411d0115b16826f3d327b6abb0192c8a2001
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The
From: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:52:02 -0600
> [ 3489.194392] __ion_alloc+0x180/0x988
I do not see the __ion_alloc function in my tree.
Should be fixed by:
commit ad65a2f05695aced349e308193c6e2a6b1d87112
Author: Wei Wang
Date: Sat Jun 17 10:42:35 2017 -0700
ipv6: call dst_hold_safe() properly
Thanks for the info Stefano.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Auror
On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:52:02 -0600
Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
> We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
>
> It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some
> path and allocated
> to ion driver. ion driver has also freed it. Finally the memo
17 matches
Mail list logo
