Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Thanks Francois, after your suggestions, network performance was twice
> increased, but I'm still loosing to freebsd:
Ok, now that the Linux kernel is not in heavy debugging mode, it takes
some ~10 us/(sent packet). It is not _too_ far from the usual
Francois Romieu wrote:
Is there any chance to get linux worked at least as fast, as freebsd-6.1
with small udp packets?
Any help will be more than welcome!
Please, CC: me, due to I'm not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you publish dmesg, vmstat 1 and /proc/interrupts somewhere ?
ftp://b
Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Is there any chance to get linux worked at least as fast, as freebsd-6.1
> with small udp packets?
> Any help will be more than welcome!
> Please, CC: me, due to I'm not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you publish dmesg, vmstat 1 and /proc/interr
Francois Romieu wrote:
Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
Any ideas are welcome.
Usually my Pavlov answer is "disable iptables, run latest kernel, renice
ksoftirqd like hell, see if it makes a difference and keep netdev Cced".
Of course there is no iptables. And linux-2.6.18 show
(adding netdev to Cc: so that the patch gets publically known)
Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Hello Francois. I've figured out, that this patch wasn't merged in
> linux-2.6.18 :(
Bad timing. Patches are available.
> Is there any plans to merge it in mainline ?
Jeff pulled most
