Re: Update

2019-02-08 Thread Douglas Lewis
Compliment of the day, I represent Nexen Petrochemical International Trade based in the UK. My company exports and markets Petrochemical Products for world trade. Having gone through a methodical search, I decided to contact you hoping that you will find this proposal interesting. I am intereste

Re: Update ip command line processing

2007-12-20 Thread Simon Horman
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 03:21:21PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:57:32 +0900 > > > @@ -1414,9 +1414,16 @@ late_initcall(ip_auto_config); > > */ > > static int __init ic_proto_name(char *name) > > { > > + if (!name) { > > +

Re: Update ip command line processing

2007-12-20 Thread David Miller
From: Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:57:32 +0900 > @@ -1414,9 +1414,16 @@ late_initcall(ip_auto_config); > */ > static int __init ic_proto_name(char *name) > { > + if (!name) { > + return 1; > + } I do not see any circumstance under which this p

Re: update frequency for stats in /proc/net/dev

2007-12-18 Thread Mark Seger
Thomas Graf wrote: * Mark Seger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 08:37 Anyhow, I just wanted to let people know that ALL tools that monitor once a second on older counters will get the wrong numbers and tools that correct for the wrong number by using fractional intervals (and I suspect min

Re: update frequency for stats in /proc/net/dev

2007-12-18 Thread Thomas Graf
* Mark Seger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 08:37 > Anyhow, I just wanted to let people know that ALL tools that monitor > once a second on older counters will get the wrong numbers and tools > that correct for the wrong number by using fractional intervals (and I > suspect mine is the only one

Re: Update of the r8169 branch

2006-09-22 Thread Francois Romieu
Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Thanks Francois, after your suggestions, network performance was twice > increased, but I'm still loosing to freebsd: Ok, now that the Linux kernel is not in heavy debugging mode, it takes some ~10 us/(sent packet). It is not _too_ far from the usual

Re: Update of the r8169 branch

2006-09-22 Thread Boris B. Zhmurov
Francois Romieu wrote: Is there any chance to get linux worked at least as fast, as freebsd-6.1 with small udp packets? Any help will be more than welcome! Please, CC: me, due to I'm not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can you publish dmesg, vmstat 1 and /proc/interrupts somewhere ? ftp://b

Re: Update of the r8169 branch

2006-09-21 Thread Francois Romieu
Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Is there any chance to get linux worked at least as fast, as freebsd-6.1 > with small udp packets? > Any help will be more than welcome! > Please, CC: me, due to I'm not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can you publish dmesg, vmstat 1 and /proc/interr

Re: Update of the r8169 branch

2006-09-21 Thread Boris B. Zhmurov
Francois Romieu wrote: Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] Any ideas are welcome. Usually my Pavlov answer is "disable iptables, run latest kernel, renice ksoftirqd like hell, see if it makes a difference and keep netdev Cced". Of course there is no iptables. And linux-2.6.18 show

Re: Update of the r8169 branch

2006-09-20 Thread Francois Romieu
(adding netdev to Cc: so that the patch gets publically known) Boris B. Zhmurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Hello Francois. I've figured out, that this patch wasn't merged in > linux-2.6.18 :( Bad timing. Patches are available. > Is there any plans to merge it in mainline ? Jeff pulled most