Re: TCP port randomization

2007-10-18 Thread Krzysztof Oledzki
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:15:48 +0200 (CEST) Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Is it normal

Re: TCP port randomization

2007-10-17 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:15:48 +0200 (CEST) > > Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> Is it normal that TCP port random

Re: TCP port randomization

2007-10-17 Thread Krzysztof Oledzki
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:15:48 +0200 (CEST) Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Is it normal that TCP port randomization (tested with 2.6.22) works only when explicitly binding to a IP address: --- cut here --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: TCP port randomization

2007-10-17 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:15:48 +0200 (CEST) Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Is it normal that TCP port randomization (tested with 2.6.22) works only > when explicitly binding to a IP address: > > > --- cut here --- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11 > (UNKNOWN)