Re: TCP congestion graphs (2.6.19-rc4)

2006-11-28 Thread David Miller
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:30:28 -0800 (PST) > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:10:07 -0800 > > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:25:16 -0800 > > "Xiaoliang (David) Wei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It seems that the def

Re: TCP congestion graphs (2.6.19-rc4)

2006-11-02 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:44:18 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:58:48 -0800 > > > Some basic stuff is on the parent page > > http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp > > Are you using tcptrace to gener

Re: TCP congestion graphs (2.6.19-rc4)

2006-11-01 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:58:48 -0800 > Some basic stuff is on the parent page > http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp Are you using tcptrace to generate those plots? If so are you using xplot or gnuplot to build those image files? Thanks. - T

Re: TCP congestion graphs (2.6.19-rc4)

2006-10-31 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:25:00 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:30:28PM -0800, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > BTW, Stephen, can you give a short HOWTO on how you generate those > > graphs, given a tcpdump trace? Thanks a lot. > > That wo

Re: TCP congestion graphs (2.6.19-rc4)

2006-10-31 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:30:28PM -0800, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > BTW, Stephen, can you give a short HOWTO on how you generate those > graphs, given a tcpdump trace? Thanks a lot. That would be great. Please also describe your setup so others algos could be tested too. Thank yo

Re: TCP congestion graphs (2.6.19-rc4)

2006-10-31 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:10:07 -0800 > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:25:16 -0800 > "Xiaoliang (David) Wei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It seems that the default Vegas alpha parameter in the rc4 is 1... > > > > I observed similar situation with the NS2Li

Re: TCP congestion graphs (2.6.19-rc4)

2006-10-31 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:25:16 -0800 "Xiaoliang (David) Wei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/31/06, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I reran the tests, this time using my DSL line to home (80ms 1Mbit/sec). > > http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/2.6.19-rc4/dsl > > > >

Re: TCP congestion graphs (2.6.19-rc4)

2006-10-31 Thread Xiaoliang (David) Wei
On 10/31/06, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I reran the tests, this time using my DSL line to home (80ms 1Mbit/sec). http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/2.6.19-rc4/dsl The only obvious problem is Vegas looks broken. Thanks, Stephen. It seems that the default Vegas a

Re: TCP congestion graphs

2006-10-26 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:50:19 +0200 Hagen Paul Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > is your rt-patch to netem public available? > > Best regards > > HGN > The tools are in the tcp directory http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/tcp/netem-2.6.18-rt.patch -- Stephen Hemminger

Re: TCP congestion graphs

2006-10-26 Thread Hagen Paul Pfeifer
Hi Stephen, is your rt-patch to netem public available? Best regards HGN -- Signed and/or encrypted mails preferd. Key-Id = 0x98350C22 Fingerprint = 490F 557B 6C48 6D7E 5706 2EA2 4A22 8D45 9835 0C22 Key available under: www.jauu.net/download/gnupg_key - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: TCP congestion graphs

2006-10-25 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:34:17 -0400 "Injong Rhee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure why the slow start for cubic is slower than the others. > We will check on this. > I think it is because cubic initializes with a ssthresh of 100, and others leave ssthresh uninitialized until the first loss.

Re: TCP congestion graphs

2006-10-25 Thread Injong Rhee
Not sure why the slow start for cubic is slower than the others. We will check on this. - Original Message - From: "Stephen Hemminger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Douglas Leith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Sangtae Ha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:02 PM Subject: TC