Re: Remove Prism II support from Orinoco

2006-06-14 Thread Mike Kershaw
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:24:49PM +0300, Jar wrote: > It always loads itself with or without blacklist. That's why I have to > do 'rm -f orinoco*.* && depmod -a' when the new kernel arrives. Seems > that users are directed to use unsecure orinoco (wep) driver rather than > secure hostap (wpa/wp

Re: Remove Prism II support from Orinoco

2006-06-14 Thread Jiri Benc
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 07:30:56 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Unfortunately, that workaround doesn't work so well when you want to > have the ability to plug real orinoco (hermes) cards to your computer... > In other words and unless I'm missing something, there isn't currently a > way to have a He

Re: Remove Prism II support from Orinoco

2006-06-13 Thread Jar
Stephen Hemminger wrote: >use blacklist in module config to block one. >Just put in /etc/modprobe.conf >blacklist orinoco Unfortunately this is not work at least it is not work with FC4. I can blacklist eepro100 and 8139cp. blacklist eepro100 blacklist 8139cp but I can't blacklist orinoco_p

Re: Remove Prism II support from Orinoco

2006-06-12 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> my problem is that for my prism 2 adapter both drivers are loaded at >> which point neither of them works. I'm running FC5, and i have to >> keep removing the orinoco*.ko files to keep them from loading, so I'm >> all for this patch. >> > > use blacklist in module conf

Re: Remove Prism II support from Orinoco

2006-06-12 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On 12/06/06 17:10 -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > On 6/12/06, John W. Linville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:49:54AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > > > >> Having two drivers supporting the same set of hardware seems pretty > >> pointless to me. Plus, it confuses hotplu