From: David Windsor
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 07:42:51 -0500
> struct inet_peer objects get freed when their reference count
> becomes -1, not 0 as is the usual case. Is there a reason why this
> is so?
inet peer entries that sit in the tree, but have no other reference
taken, have a reference cou
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, David Windsor wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working on a patchset that adds overflow protection to kernel
>> reference counters, as part of the KSPP effort. We're introducing a
>> new type, tentativel
Hello,
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, David Windsor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a patchset that adds overflow protection to kernel
> reference counters, as part of the KSPP effort. We're introducing a
> new type, tentatively called refcount_t, that will ultimately replace
> atomic_t as the t
