Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c

2007-09-02 Thread Christian Kujau
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Vendor module calls kernel api incorrectly. dev_set_promiscuity requires that the calling thread hold rtnl mutex (ie call rtnl_lock). It's their bug, netdev doesn't want to hear about it. OK, that's all I needed to know. Thank you both for your comme

Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c

2007-09-02 Thread Johannes Berg
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 18:05 +0200, Christian Kujau wrote: > but given the amount of changes currently > going into net/ I thought this might be interesting: > > [15604.137408] RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c (2595) > [15604.138807] [] __dev_set_promiscuity+0xc2/0xd0 > [15604.139163] [

Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c

2007-09-02 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:05:33 +0200 (CEST) Christian Kujau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, I should really update more often. Skipping the last -rc versions > AND adding a new device (zd1211rw) to the box turns out to be quite > interesting ([0],[1]). > > However, this time loading of a (propri