> -Original Message-
> From: David Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:32 PM
> To: Caitlin Bestler
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Michael S. Tsirkin;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: RFC: move SDP from AF_INET_SDP to IPPR
IPPROTO_* should match the protocol field on the wire, which
I gather isn't different. And I'm assuming there is no standard API
defined already...
What about using a socket option?
+-DLS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Stevens
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 11:49 AM
> To: Michael S. Tsirkin
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: RFC: move SDP from AF_IN
Quoting r. David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: RFC: move SDP from AF_INET_SDP to IPPROTO_SDP
>
> I don't know any details about SDP, but if there are no differences at the
> protocol layer, then neither the address family nor the protocol is
> appropriate.
I don't know any details about SDP, but if there are no differences at the
protocol layer, then neither the address family nor the protocol is
appropriate. If it's just an API change, the socket type is the right
selector. So, maybe SOCK_DIRECT to go along with SOCK_STREAM,
SOCK_DGRAM, etc.
