On Tue 17 May 17:43 PDT 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, 17 May 2016 14:11:54 -0400 (EDT) David Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bjorn Andersson
> > Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:19:09 -0700
> >
> > > I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the
> > > Q
Hi David,
On Tue, 17 May 2016 14:11:54 -0400 (EDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> From: Bjorn Andersson
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:19:09 -0700
>
> > I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the
> > Qualcomm SOC, please include this in your pull towards Linus to avoid
> > th
From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:19:09 -0700
> I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the
> Qualcomm SOC, please include this in your pull towards Linus to avoid
> the merge conflict.
Pulled, thanks.
On Friday 13 May 2016 17:47:17 Andy Gross wrote:
> On 13 May 2016 at 17:19, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri 13 May 14:01 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday 10 May 2016 11:39:34 Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > [..]
> >> > I assume we could have the QRTR go through Andy and arm-soc, wit
On 13 May 2016 at 17:19, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 13 May 14:01 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 10 May 2016 11:39:34 Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> [..]
>> > I assume we could have the QRTR go through Andy and arm-soc, with
>> > David's approval and this fix squashed in. But we're r