On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:28:20PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:49:35PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > OK, I think I've got the right bug this time.
>
> Here is the patch for the other bug that I found along the way:
>
> [UDP6]: Fix MSG_PROBE crash
>
This one fixes. T
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:40:18AM +0200, cagri coltekin wrote:
> >
> > No. Bug is the first after boot:
>
> OK, I think I've got the right bug this time.
>
> [UDP6]: Fix flowi clobbering
>
> The udp6_sendmsg function uses a shared buffer to store the
> f
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:49:35PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> OK, I think I've got the right bug this time.
Here is the patch for the other bug that I found along the way:
[UDP6]: Fix MSG_PROBE crash
UDP tracks corking status through the pending variable. The
IP layer also tracks it through t
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:40:18AM +0200, cagri coltekin wrote:
>
> No. Bug is the first after boot:
OK, I think I've got the right bug this time.
[UDP6]: Fix flowi clobbering
The udp6_sendmsg function uses a shared buffer to store the
flow without taking any locks. This leads to races with SMP
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:38:29AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:21:22PM +0200, cagri coltekin wrote:
> >
> > --
> > [ 1395.890897] [ cut here ]
> > [ 1395.946093] kernel BUG
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:21:22PM +0200, cagri coltekin wrote:
>
> --
> [ 1395.890897] [ cut here ]
> [ 1395.946093] kernel BUG at net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:940!
Could you go further back in the logs t
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 10:15:30PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:22:48PM +0200, cagri coltekin wrote:
> >
> > The second causes the system to give the bug a couple of seconds
> > after bind starts, and loads the zones, without any traffic going
> > on. BTW, patch applie
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:22:48PM +0200, cagri coltekin wrote:
>
> The second causes the system to give the bug a couple of seconds
> after bind starts, and loads the zones, without any traffic going
> on. BTW, patch applied with some offset difference (3 for the
> first -48 for the other two chan
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 05:05:57PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:12:43PM +0200, cagri coltekin wrote:
> >
> > It took a while to find equipment for test environment, but now I
> > have a test environment that I can test.
> >
> > Here is the result:
> >
> > ---
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:12:43PM +0200, cagri coltekin wrote:
>
> It took a while to find equipment for test environment, but now I
> have a test environment that I can test.
>
> Here is the result:
>
> ---
> [17180051.768
Hi Again,
It took a while to find equipment for test environment, but now I
have a test environment that I can test.
Here is the result:
---
[17180051.768000] ip6_fragment: hlen = 0x818, len = 0x7ce, nexthdr=4
[17180051.8400
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:49:07AM +0200, cagri coltekin wrote:
>
> Ooops, sorry for the confusion. It happens with 2.6.17 too (see
> below), cut&paste from wrong log. The rest of the data provided
> in the previous message is actually fresh.
Thanks. Please try this patch and tell me if it print
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:16:56AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> cagri coltekin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Aug 25 04:03:35 ns kernel: [ cut here ]
> > Aug 25 04:03:35 ns kernel: kernel BUG at net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:718!
> > Aug 25 04:03:35 ns kernel: invalid operand: 00
cagri coltekin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Aug 25 04:03:35 ns kernel: [ cut here ]
> Aug 25 04:03:35 ns kernel: kernel BUG at net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:718!
> Aug 25 04:03:35 ns kernel: invalid operand: [#1]
> Aug 25 04:03:35 ns kernel: SMP
> Aug 25 04:03:35 ns kernel:
14 matches
Mail list logo
